Sunday, December 22, 2013

Completing The Verse/ A Time Honored Tradition

Completing The Verse/ A Time Honored Tradition

Is Leay Tasweer e Janaan Hum Nain Banwai Naheen


My dear friend Dr Shahid Latif runs a very vibrant list of Pakistani physicians. http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ApnaList/info

A few months back, in May 2013, Dr Alam Ara posted the following on the list. Around the same time it was posted in the Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/apni.zuban.urdu/posts/511529735573629

The king asks his four subjects, a religious scholar, a lover, a blind man and a pauper, to complete the couplet with a second verse of their own. 

The first verse literally means: 
That is the reason I (royal we) did not commission beloved's portrait.
Is leay tasweer e jaana hum nay banwai naheen


Religious scholar: As idolatry is against the religion, I ----

Lover: Singularity would have been lost, So I----

Blind: As I cannot see and it would not speak, I ----

Pauper: As it would have cost and I am penniless, I----




ایک بادشاہ نے چار آدمی طلب کئے ان میں سے ایک عالم تھا ، دوسرا عاشق تھا، تیسرا نابینا تھا اور چوتھا غریب تھا ، بادشاہ نے ان چاروں سے کہا کہ میرے دماغ میں ایک مصرعہ آیا ہے تم لوگ اسکو مکمل کرو ، مصرعہ یہ ہے:
۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ ­۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔
؎ اسلئے تصویر جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں
۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ ­۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ ­۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ ­۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔
چاروں نے تھوڑا سوچ بچار کیا اور اپنے اپنے حساب سے شعر بنائے جو کچھ یوں ہیں:

عالم : ؎
بت پرستی دین احمد میں کبھی آئی نہیں
اسلئے تصویر جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں

عاشق : ؎
ایک سے جب دو ہوئے پھر لطف یکتائی نہیں
اسلئے تصویر جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں

نابینا : ؎
ہم میں بینائی نہیں اور اس میں گویائی نہیں
اسلئے تصویر جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں

غریب : ؎
مانگتے پیسے مصور جیب میں پائی نہیں
اسلئے تصویر جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں


Apart from what people posted on the facebook, among our own group some tried in light vein.

Amer Akmal posted:

چہرہ بالوں میں چھپا ملتا کوئی  نائی  نہیں
اسلئے تصویر جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں

Aftab Naz, notorious for his light comedy, posted:

پیار مانگا تھا مگر لفٹ اس نے کروائی نہیں 
اسلئے تصور جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں 

But then there was our own veteran Abdul Rehman Abd, a published poet. The following were his extempore verses.

Fiance': As she has as yet, not vowed till death, I ---

Miser: Counterfeit earns no respect when the original is in hand, So I----------

منگیتر :
مجھ پہ مرنے کی قسم اس نے ابھی کھائی نہیں
اس لیے تصویر جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں 

کنجوس عاشق :
اصل ہو تو نقل کی کوئی پزیرائی نہیں 
اس لیے تصویر جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں 

And then he thought of two other couplets and posted right back. 

One was from the competitor suitor, ie Raqeeb and the other, a real classic Abd one, was from the Next door (next window) neighbor. Enjoy: 

Competitor: Contended with the copycats? Not me, so I -----


رقیب :
نقل پہ ہوں مطمئن میں وہ تماشائی نہیں 
اس لیتے تصویر جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں 

Next Door: Never needed that!
Aaj tak is ki zaroorat hum ko paish aai naheen
Is leay tasweer e janaan hum nay banwaain naheen

ہمسایہ :
آج تک اس کی ضرورت ہم کو پیش آئ نہیں 
اس لیے تصویر جاناں ہم نے بنوائی نہیں 


PS: I have not yet found the complete original couplet nor the name of the poet.
Anybody knows?

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Knowing Jesus Through Reza Aslan





Front Cover




The first time I heard of Reza Aslan was in 2006, when his book  'No god but God' was out. He was on book tour and was invited to various CAIR events. He was a good speaker and spoke very well about the need for community activism and engagement with the larger civil society.
Never in that time I got any hint of his personal story. The journey he had traveled to reach there. I assume that he was not hiding his detour into Christianity before reverting back to Islam. It was not hidden but it was not out there. At that time I read his book; it was a good one. It is a good introduction to Islam for an outsider. It was objectively written and addressed many controversial issues head on. He did claim to write as an insider.
Then somehow I stopped seeing his name in the invitations to community events.

Fast forward 2013 and I heard that a book is out on Jesus, written by a former Christian. The writer was being unjustly bashed for authoring a book like that and his credentials were questioned. Fox News interview had gone viral. I did not pay much attention to that, and only later realized that the author was Reza Aslan. I got interested, saw the interview and eventually read the book.
It is interesting to note his personal history. Transplanted at a young age from Iran to California at the time of revolution, his family was part of the Shah's elite. Religion was only a name tag for them both in Iran and after moving to USA. Religion was considered synonymous with all things bad with Iran and their traumatic uprooting. Growing up in California he found Jesus. Not only that, he was able to convince his family including his mother to convert. Later he married a Christian. Eventually he moved on and found a new meaning of his parent's religion. Now he is a former Christian, and a professor of religious studies. He has not lost interest in the person of Jesus and this eventually let him on a quest to find the historical Jesus; not what is the image of Jesus as the Christ and the Savior.

This is the first book I have read about Jesus. So my limitations are there. I cannot sift out what is mainstream Christian belief and what is considered objectionable by those who believe in Jesus as the savior. Nevertheless, I think it gives much information in a seemingly non judgemental way, that the reader may derive his or her own conclusions.

To me it offered a lot of information. Until now, all my knowledge base is based on what Islam and Quran says about Jesus. I have learned the Islamic version of Jesus What is believed to be Jesus's story and what is the supposedly wrong concepts accepted or corrupted by the Christian clergy.

I mention the following for my own benefit and for the interest of those like me, who may find these pieces of information interesting, if not puzzling or outright blasphemous.
  • Jesus time was the time of Roman occupation of Palestine. It meant much of present day Israel, Palestinian territory, Lebanon and Syria. The Temple was still there in Jerusalem. It was destroyed in 70 AD, some forty years after Jesus crucifixion. Jesus was not alone in that century to claim being Messiah. There were many at that time who professed to be the awaited messiah. Many are mentioned in Roman and Jewish sources but Jesus is NOT.
  • There are four gospels, all are written after the destruction of the Temple. They are 'authored' by Mark, Mathews, Luke and John. First was around 70 AC and the last was around 120 AC. They all show Jesus as a pacifist, and each subsequent gospel raise his image closer to the status of being a part of godhead.
  • There is a discrepancy in the books as to where he was born. Most believe it is Nazareth, but two of the gospels say it was Bethlehem. The thought being that Bible states that the Messiah will be from David's lineage. Bethlehem was David's birthplace and that being Jesus's birthplace would ease the claim of the same lineage.
  • He had four brothers, James, Joseph, Simon and Judas, and many sisters. All from Joseph and Mary, although some revisionism has taken place and some claim that Mary had no other children. All these 'siblings' were Joseph's children from a prior marriage. (This is reminiscent of a certain belief that Bibi Fatima is the only child of Prophet and other daughter's of Prophet were in fact Khadeja's children from earlier marriage)
  • In fact his brother James was the leader of the religious movement after Jesus was crucified. This is interesting as the concept of Virgin Mary and the immaculate conception of Mary is quite quintessential to the Catholicism
  • His birth, and early life is missed in the gospels. The first gospel, Mark's starts with his baptism by John. (Hazrat Yahya)
  • There is an interesting shift in the narrative of Jesus's spiritual relationship with John in the four gospels. In the first one, there is clear mention that Jesus was baptized by John, placing John at a superior spiritual level. By the fourth gospel John is telling that the one after him ie Jesus is the main person. 
  • As John had a miraculous birth, born of an old barren mother, it became important that Jesus's birth should be even more miraculous ie virgin birth. 
  • There is a juicy story about the death of John. He had objected that the local Jewish client-king tetrarch Herod Antipas had married to his brother's wife, Herodius. She was not happy with John for that reason. One day she asked her daughter, the 'sultry temptress' Salome to perform a lascivious dance in front of his step father. Smitten by her beauty, he asked her to ask whatever she wanted, The girl looked at her mother who asked for John's head.
  • Many of John's followers eventually became Jesus' followers after John's execution. In fact two or the 12 Apostle (hawari) were initially John's disciple.
  • Jesus had around 72 disciples; it included women. They were asked to chose Jesus above their families. (72 comes as a sacred number in Islam also. There were 72 martyrs. In Islam also one is asked to love the Prophet more than their family members ie children and wives)
  • The inner core of disciples were the 12 apostles. All were men, and some were originally John's disciples. They were 12, corresponding to the 12 Jewish tribes. And when one of them was killed, (Judas Iscariot, the one who betrayed Jesus to the Romans, another was chosen immediately to keep the number 12 constant. Again, 12 is a sacred number in Islam, ie twelve Imams) 
  • Jesus did not want to perform miracles on gentiles and compared them, at least in one quotation, to dogs (Mark 7:27)
  • Jesus had enough with those seeking miracles, Mathew 12:38. Something like Quran's abhorrence for miracles. 
  • Some Jews thought of Jesus as Elijah reincarnated.
  • Many people are called Son of God in Bible. We in Islam familiar with the verse which mentions Uzair as being claimed son of God. In Bible the son of God is used as a sign of closeness to God. David in Psalms 2:7 and Israel in Exodus 4:22 are claimed to be God's sons.
  • Jesus had called himself Son of Man. 
  • The quote which sealed the fate of Jesus, was when asked by rabbis whether it is right to pay tithe to Romans. He looked at the coin, which had Caesar's imprint on it., and said, "Give back to Caesar what belongs to him and give back to God what belongs to Him'. As per Reza it meant openly rebellious thoughts, as it meant that Jerusalem does not belong to Caesar.
  • Jesus himself named James as his heir.
  • After the crucifixion of Jesus, his family stayed on in Jerusalem instead of going back to Galilee. His brother James, became the leader of the mission, ie head of the 12 Apostles. 
  • James was later stoned to death by Jewish Temple authorities. It is his death, mentioned in the historical account of a first century Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus, which is the first ever mention of Jesus in any non biblical literature. It mentions the death of 'James, the brother of Jesus, the one they call messiah'. It was in year 90 AC or so
  • There was a divide in the Christian community early on when the outside Jews ie the Diaspora Jews which were more Romanized became more involved. These Jews had been exposed to the Roman way of life and were critical of the traditional ways of Jewish rabbis and priests. They found the message of Jesus much interesting and close to heart. Eventually there were two groups of believers in Jesus, the Hellenists (the Romanized Jews of Diaspora) vs the 'Hebrews" the locals. The Hebrews were more inclined to keep Jesus in the Jewish tradition, while the Hellenists wanted to do nothing with the Jewish traditions. The main leader of the Hellenists was Paul.
  • Paul was NOT one of the 12 Apostles and never knew Jesus personally. He was an avid opponent and supporter of the persecution of Jesus followers after his crucifixion. He only changed when he had a vision of Jesus who asked him "Why are you persecuting me?"
  • There was a constant tussle between Paul and James, Jesus' brother. In the end Paul had to succumb to James demand and reluctantly performed rituals at the Temple, acknowledging the Jewish base of Jesus' mission. At that time Jewish hierarchy tried to punish him for all what he had said about them, but Roman soldiers captured him, mistaking him as another suspect they were looking for.
  • The story of Paul's imprisonment highly resembles what Quran says about Jesus that someone else was taken by the Roman's thinking of that person as Jesus.
  • Later on Paul's case was transferred to Rome on his request.  Where he was eventually executed, along with Peter, first of the Apostles, who was in Rome before Paul arrived. The King mistakenly thought both of them playing a role in the Jewish Revolt which ultimately led to the destruction of the Temple by Romans a few years later in 70 AC
  • Paul's Jesus was the first creation before Adam was created. (Similar to what many Muslims believe that the Prophet was the first creation even before Adam)
  • Paul's epistles, which eventually became the hard core of Christianity as practiced today, had no mention of historical Jesus. 
  • The Jewish revolt which evicted Romans from Jerusalem was spearheaded by the Sacrii. Very much like the present day Taliban, they were very militant in nature, and the slogan was no god but God (la illaha illal La). 
  • After three years of 'independence' Romans eventually captured the city and killed everybody and burned the Temple to ground. Western Wall is the only remaining remnant.
  • Many of the Romans caught on with this concept of a Jesus who is peace loving and has nothing to do with the rebellious Jews (who had to be exterminated and their Temple destroyed) in opposition to the historical Jesus who was a zealot, anti Roman and anti establishment and was eventually killed for that.  
  • In 325 AC, an all Roman Conference of Christian bishops in present day Turkey were summoned to 'resolved' the issue, at the request of the King Constance, the first Christian Roman King. They were to decide the Christian doctrine including whether Jesus was Son of God or Son of Man. They voted in favor of Jesus being literal son of God. 
  • In 398 AC in present day Algeria the New Testament was compiled. Most of Paul's writings were in it, and only one attributed to James.
  • Rest is history. Paul had won and James had lost.
  • All of Jesus life events are somewhat consistent with Jewish traditions. It is the concept of his resurrection after crucifixion, which has no precedence in Jewish religion and something new.
  • In fact the die hard belief of his followers in Jesus's resurrection made Jesus's story different form so many other claimed messiahs executed by Romans in that century. 
  • Jesus' last words, "Why have you forsaken me?"
In short, the book is not a devotional biography of Jesus. It makes a good attempt to show Jesus as a human being with all its limitations and strengths. It makes a case of how the image of Jesus has changed form a zealot he was in real life to what the world now believes as the savior and the non worldly Xristos, Jesus Christ.


Sunday, December 1, 2013

Ditched At The Bridge,سانوں نہر والے پل تے بلا کہ , By Sachal Jazz

Ditched At The Bridge
سانوں نہر والے پل تے بلا کہ
by Ted Nash


SACHAL JAZZ ENSEMBLE with Wynton Marsalis


A week later of attending Anoushka Shankar's concert, it was the performance of Sachal Jazz Ensemble at Lincoln Jazz Center, in Rose Theater at Columbus Circle.

The first time I heard of them was last December when Dave Brubeck died. I shared his Take Five with friends in his memory. An APPNA friend, Dr Naeem Siddiqi, send back the Sachal Jazz version of it.  It was an amazing mix. Later I found that the group has dared into multiple musical experiments.

Now they were here in town. They had two performances back to back, on November 22nd and 23rd, Friday and Saturday, house full. There is a good review by New York Times, but here is my take.

The emcee was Wynton Marsalis, the Music Director of Jazz at Lincoln Center Orchestra, sitting at the back with his trumpet. He did a good job of explaining the background and introduced every body. He appreciated Izzat Majeed's effort to chose Jazz as the medium of fusion, thus connecting classic Indian music with the wider audience worldwide.
 
The conductor was from Sachal, Nijat Ali. It is the first time that I saw someone conducting eastern music. A new concept! To me somehow it seems that the music flows on its own and the conductor is enjoying it, appreciating with the movements of his hands and head a lot more than actually directing it. Perhaps I do not know the ins and outs of music to make such an outlandish remark.
There were ten compositions. Five were basically Pakistani themes and the other five were Western. All of them had good mix of sounds, and some mixes were more seamless than others.

It started with Tere Ishq Nachaya by Wazir Afzal, and was very entertaining to listen to the trumpets and trombones with the tabla, sitar and bansuri.


Others included Ranjha Ranjha by Qadiur Shagan and Mahiway by Khurshid Anwar.
Among the Western compositions I knew included My Favorite Things. from the Sound of Music
 
.
Take five was excellent to watch in real life. All the notes of the music played excellently by Indrajit Roy-Chowdhury, who was sit in for Hidayat Khan. Unfortunately later his sitar's string broke down and we could not listen to more of his work.


The icing on the cake was the peace named, "She Ditched Me". What a surprise, it was famous composition by Salim Iqbal, and sung by Noor Jahan sanno nehr waly pul tey bula kay. This song is from the Pakistani Punjabi film Dukh Sajnaa De. Lyrics were by Khwaja Parvez.

Could not  have asked for more. If ever you get hold of that, please do take a listen. You will not regret it. Especially the tune played by Ted Nash on piccolo carried the night for me.

The last peace was Rythmesque composed by Nijat Ali. A master piece of a grand finale.


The exceptional work was of Baqar Abbas the flute master. Could not imagine the simplest of the musical instruments could have such a wide range of tones, both Eastern and Western and in a flute competition between him on bansuri and Ted Nash on piccolo he clearly held his edge.


And then it is Ballu Khan the maestro table player. Mind my words, he is certainly in the league with Zakir Hussain and Tari Khan.

Izzat Majeed came on stage for a short while after the intermission. He was very humble and thanked everybody. I heard that he was influenced by Louis Armstrong. I missed the discussion at the beginning of the program where he spoke at length.

It was heartening to see them perform at the Rose Hall @ Lincoln Center. Much of the audience was not Pakistani. Wished more were there.

Thursday, November 28, 2013

TRACES OF YOU, ANUOSHKA SHANKAR at NYU

TRACES OF YOU, ANUOSHKA SHANKAR


I am not a fan of the popularly know fusion music. My default opinion is that fusion creates noise and confusion. Mixing of music is hard for me to appreciate even when it includes some of the work by Late Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan.
In the last few weeks I had a chance to attend two performances. Both were experiments of fusion music between East and West. The names of performers were too tempting to resist.



First was Anuoskha Shankar, the daughter of legendary Ravi Shankar. I had heard her before when she accompanied her father years back in Carnegie Hall. Over the years she had developed her own style and has been experimenting with western music for a while. For the fans of Spanish flamenco it is a treat listening to her album Traveller, for which she earned one of her three Grammy nominations.

She performed at NYU Skirball Center of Performing Arts on November 16th, 2013. The concert was in conjunction of new 2013 release Traces of You.

It was a sold out performance, with an eclectic mixture of instruments, both eastern and western. The interesting exception was absence of tabla. The percussionist Pirashanna Thevarajah used the supposedly less sophisticated dhol which was on his lap all the times. He made good use of if and the sounded just as great.

Another percussion instrument was the Hang. It is a steel drum, a recent invention out of Switzerland,  looks like a UFO and played by hand.  It could be used both sides, he had three of them and turned upside down when needed. Gave a dull note but was interesting to watch and hear. The player was Manu Delago and when I looked up the Hand in Wikipedia, he is featured  there. Perhaps he is considered a master of this instrument and he is on her team. 
  
One very emotional piece is In Jyoti's Name. Jyoti is the name of the girl who was assaulted in a gang rape and ultimately died. It is very disturbing and the accelerated escalations of notes depict the distress, anger and despair experienced in such a horrible experience.

All her pieces were a mix of sitar along with Shehnai, dhol, tanpura, cello, keyboard, Hang and drums. It got fast and loud too much and too soon. Some items had lyrics in it. they were all in English. Supposedly the actual album would have Nora Jones, (her half sister) but in the concert it was Ayanna Witter-Johnson. She has a great voice,  but some lyrics seem out of meter.

Perhaps I did not understand this music that well. Perhaps I am a generation removed to enjoy this kind of mix. It was a bit loud for me, but still there were many enjoyable moments in the performance.


I kept on waiting to hear something purely classical. It did happen, after the concert was almost over. After taking the collective bow, she returned to the stage to play a classical piece, in memory of her father. It was no fusion, just pure sitar, and it was fantastic.

I think of all her work, the Traveller is the best. It is a fusion with the Spanish flamenco music, which some say originated from the folk tunes of gypsy Roma people, whom many consider of Indian origin.

A week later, Sachal Jazz at Lincoln Center-----

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Miss You, Abbaji

This was written on November 14th, 2013








http://www.flickr.com/photos/nasirgondal/5323497382/sizes/z/in/photostream/


Today is the Aushura Day, ie 10th of Muharram, and is also the 19th anniversary of Abbaji.
May his soul rest in eternal peace.
The more I grow older the more I realize what a guy he was.
Carefree, funny, witty, caring, sensitive and honest.
He was unable to acheive many wordly goals.
In fact he settled for a lot less than what was expected of him by his family.
Somehow he was content with what he had. What he did not have bothered him not that much.
Always managed to bring some fruit on daily basis on his way home. We always had sweets at home.
Perhaps that is why mother always thought he had more than he actually had.
When mother got sick, he took care of her for a long time, assisting her in all activities of daily life.
She perhaps did not know that he was not that well either.
He never let me know what problems and humiliation he had to go for me for my issues with the authorities.
He made sure if either of us were unaware of the expectation of the others.
Worked behind the scenes to keep us together.
He was a good man. Wish that I had known him more when he was around.
I miss you Abbaji.
Be Well.

Saturday, November 9, 2013

The Buddha's of Silla

SILLA
SHIFTING OF EMPHASIS
FROM AFTERLIFE TO HERE AND NOW



http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/11/08/arts/SILLA1_SPAN/SILLA1-articleLarge.jpg


Last week on our way upstate we stopped at Met for short while. There was a special exhibition on Silla. There had been much advertisement about it to generated interest. I was ambivalent about it in the beginning. Some old history of ancient Korea. Anyhow, I am glad we were there.

There is a good review in yesterday's New York Times. Here are my own impressions. 

This is the story of a place called Silla (pronounced Shilla). Some of the nomads in ancient Korea settled down and over a period of time settled in the south of peninsula. It eventually formed an empire which for a period of time occupied the greater part of Korea and present day North China. It is one of the longest running dynasties of the world, ruled for almost a millennium i.e, 57 BCE to 935 CE.

The exhibition has a few sections. and it starts with the tombs of its kings. Discovered in last century, they were buried under huge heaps of dirt and looked like small mountains from the outside. In a way completely merged with the environment. 

Once excavated, one sees the earlier kings to have majestic tombs. with a lot of worldly wealth and paraphernalia of goods, gold and jars, which may be needed for the afterlife. Here one sees articles from all over the world, The silk road, which spanned almost four thousand miles, from Italy through Central Asia, actually ends in Korea. This was unknown to me. Here you see a Roman glass vase to an Afghani dagger. It is a kind of museum of fifth-sixth century all in one tomb of the kings. 

Interesting to me was the gradual transformation of the contents of the tombs with the arrival of Buddhism in sixth century and its adoption by the kings. Now you see smaller tombs as the emphasis on after life was reduced and focus turned on the life of the living. At sometime the cremation replaced burial as the preferred way to go. Now the gold and the art was invested more and more for the living. This naturally turned into more artwork in the form of statues and  resemblances of Buddha.


Three Buddhas are worth seeing if you ever have a chance to see them. One is the bronze Bodhisattva in pensive pose. (see above). A thin Bodhisattva, a later reincarnation of the Buddha sitting on a pedestal, right foot resting on the left thigh, right hand holding the face, looks like he is nodding his head and the fingers are about to touch the cheek. Thinking deeply and perhaps pensively, he does not seem to be stationary. This is supposedly one of the highest treasured possession of the National Museum of Korea, National Treasure 83. Really a treat to watch. 




The second is the small, all gold Amitaba Buddha. It is a delicate piece of art. Here Buddha is rather plump, considered a celestial Buddha, probably in his our recreated paradise. where environment is right to pursue enlightenment.

The biggest prize is the larger than life Buddha, made of cast iron, sitting in a lotus chokri position. His hands are gone, but the description is that the left hand sits in the lap with palm up denoting meditation. The right hand is supposedly touching the earth. That is the position, the audio guide explains, first seen in Pakistan. The legend goes that while the Buddha was mediating, evil forces tried to distract him. While sitting still he just touched the earth with his right hand and the evil forces vanished away. A connection with the earth, was instrumental in getting rid of all worldly distractions, sifli jazbaat.

Take home for me was the re-realization of Buddha and his teachings: focus on this life, an attempt and quest to seek light and truth in this world, least-to-no emphasis on the after life, and strength to field away distractions, worldly or otherwise. 

--------------------------------------------------
References:

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Murshad Arshad Warraich


Murshad Arshad Warraich



One day, January 30th to be precise, I got a rather terse email from Shakeel, "Gondal ,Murshad Dr Arshad has died yesterday in Jahanian. No child behind except widow. b/c of  excess intake of methylated sprit. Shakeel"

It left me stunned for a long while. I could not believe it, really did not want to believe it; but it was right there in front of my eyes. Shakeel is the anchorman of our class. He is the one who keeps tab on everybody. And I mean everybody. He knows about the ones no one else would know. It was the collective good luck of our class, N28 as we are called, that he is stationed at Nishtar. A few years back when it was time for our Silver Jubilee, he was instrumental in getting everybody on board. He fished out long lost class mates no matter what part of the world they had slowly drifted to. No, he could not be wrong, Murshid must be gone. And the story, sadly did not seem too far from what really may happen with him.

He may not have been spotted out by Guinness Books scouts, Murshad had broken the record for the longest tenure as a medical student. Enrolled with us in 1979, (actually the session started in Sept 78 but classes were postponed till ZA Bhutto was hanged) he finally graduated in 2007. I do not think that Mian Ahsan Bari or Mian Rashid( now a Principal of a government medical college) can beat that. Murshad took almost twenty nine years to finish medical school. 

And now he is not there any more. Too bad.

It was middle of the day and I was commuting form one place of work to another. My thoughts flew back to those sultry days of 1979 Multan summer when I first met him. He was a rather quite individual, easily recognized to be from a small agrarian town, intrigued by a big city but not intimidated by it. A zamindar Jat to the core, born in Gurjat and lived most of his life in Jahanian. We both found ourselves living in the Student Union office, thanks to the housing conditions in those days. The Liberals were in power in the Student Union and we were accommodated in its 'Union Office" situated right in the middle of the western wall of the Quadrangle, the educational block of the college. It was a prized location as it was directly opposite Rafida Hall, the girl's hostel. Arshad and I became acquainted quite early. He could easily make you feel relaxed and open up. Because of that, despite his quite demenear, he had a lot of friends. 

He was a very relaxed man. He would always make a light joke at the end of every conversation and no matter how serious would be the discussion at hand, he would make you laugh. Not very fond of the Madam Tahira Bukhari's Dissection Hall and the smoke drums of Baba Gulzar, we both used to hang out and experiment with nicotine et al during the time rest were honing their skills with scalpels and action potentials. With time his sufiana mystic attitude on life and detached way of living earned him the title of Murshad. His seniority as a chronic student augmented his image as such. 

Early on, he had befriended a class fellow from Jhang and they shared a separate room in next to the student union's office. Their friendship, grew with time and was the topic of discussion all the times among friends and foes. The guy form Jhang was an attractive zoftig fella, wide eyed, and had a melodious voice. I heard Rafi's song,, mujhe ishq hay tuijhi say meri jaane zindagani'  from him for the first time. Phiki pay gayi chun tarian di lo  was his another hit item. Many seniors used that as an excuse to come to Students' Union and request him to sing. At those times, it was a joy to watch Arshad enjoying the songs and the music. Full of nicotine and smoke to the deepest alveoli, he transcended easily to a different world. Their bond was strong and got stronger by the day.

I left Nishtar in the third year of the medical college. I kept on hearing about him and occasionally met him when I visited Multan. He had difficult time keeping up with his class he slowly lagged behind in studies. After his close friend migrated to Lahore, it was harder for him to continue. At least that was the conclusion of many. He had rough time with the people of authority and took a long scenic route to the finishing line. He ultimately graduated in 2007. On one of my trips to Pakistan in late 2007 I visited him with Shakeel in the old District Hospital Multan. He was doing his housejob. His ward registrar was fifteen years his junior. 

After finishing housejob, which he finished one way or the other, he moved back to his native Jahanian. He ultimately fond attraction in the softer gender, got married and worked in a Basic Health Unit. A few years back I heard that the class-fellow from Jhang, suddenly passed away after having a big meal at a wedding. Coronary event? Perhaps yes. I thought it must be devastating for Arshad. 

What do you do when someone you feel close to is gone and there is no family member of his who is close to you. In fact you do not know any of his family. You grieve with whom you have shared memories of the deceased. Later in the day I called Shakeel and we offered condolence to each other. I was planning to go to Pakistan later in the Spring and expressed the desire to go to his hometown. Years earlier Shakeel and I had visited another class mates grave, Masood Bajwa who took his life too early. Another deeply tragic story, for another day.

I asked Shakee. Will he find more about him and get some arrangements made ahead of time. He surely would do. He had gotten this information form a friend who had read the news in the paper. He would get the information about the family of Arshad and his exact date of death.

Three weeks later, I got a pleasant surprise in my mailbox. 'No date of death. Dr Arshad is alive. I talked to him today, Actually there was a quack in the area who died. His name was also Dr Arshad."  OOFF.  What a relief. I could not imagine the joke played on us.

Perhaps the nature of the news was such that many thought believable but not appropriate as a topic of discussion. Some may have talked it among themselves, but no body felt like being the first one to break the news to others. His brief period of assumed death was kept as a closely guarded open secret.

I got Murshad's number and talked to him. He was aware of the confusion. He told me in his murshidaana way that he did not like the way the life is after death and decided to come back. Main ho aaya aanمیں  ہو آیا آں  We decided to meet.

He was kind enough to come to Multan when I visited Pakistan. We spend a long evening together with Shakeel and Shikrani, who came from Ahmedpur Sharqia (East). Zafri Shah and Zia Ghani were there too. 

Mushad was as thin as ever, his body mass more bones than the muscles  Still he had his hairs all KalaKola'ed and looked as old as he looked thirty years back. He was in the beginning of a new relationship with a lady. He said with his signature smile that he was hopeful it will end in matrimony. 

I briefly mentioned the classmate form Jhang, and it seemed that he was not aware of what has happened. He thought he has recently spoken with him. I dared not continue that topic with him. What if he really does not know or was it my wrong impression. Either way I did not want to continue that thread with him lest that I would be the first person to mention that. 

We ate at the new Shangri-La as the old one is now history. And then he was chauffeured back to Jahanian by a baradri member who doubled as his driver. All this time, Murshad was in his signature calm and relaxed state of mind. Attitude towards life and the hereafter not much affected by the years of scholarship. Holding potent cigarettes between his fingers he could very well live for another lifetime, a day at a time. 

Some love affairs never end.